Skip to Content

Blog > Developing a RACI matrix for accessibility

Developing a RACI matrix for accessibility

Karl Groves. - 30/07/2024

In the world of digital projects, ensuring clear roles and responsibilities is crucial for success. One effective tool for achieving this is the RACI matrix, which stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed. This framework helps teams define who is involved in specific tasks and what their level of involvement is. Let’s explore how a RACI matrix can be applied to digital accessibility projects.

What is a RACI Matrix?

A RACI matrix is a simple chart that maps out tasks and activities against roles within a project. Each role is assigned one of the four RACI attributes:

  • Responsible (R): The person who performs the work to complete the task.
  • Accountable (A): The person who is ultimately answerable for the task and has the authority to make decisions.
  • Consulted (C): Those who provide input and feedback, with whom there is two-way communication.
  • Informed (I): Those who need to be kept updated on progress and outcomes, with whom there is one-way communication.

Applying RACI to Digital Accessibility

Digital accessibility ensures that websites and digital tools are usable by people with disabilities. Given the multi-disciplinary nature of accessibility work, a RACI matrix can help coordinate efforts among team members. Here’s an example RACI matrix for a digital accessibility project:

Activity/Task Project Manager Accessibility Lead UX/UI Designer Developer QA Tester Content Creator Legal/ Compliance Stakeholders
Develop Accessibility StrategyARCCICCI
Conduct Accessibility AuditARCCCCCI
Define Accessibility RequirementsARCCICCI
Design Accessible UX/UIACRCIIII
Develop Accessible CodeACIRCIII
Create Accessible ContentACIIIRII
Test for Accessibility ComplianceACCCRIII
Fix Accessibility IssuesACIRCIII
Document Accessibility PracticesARIIICII
Train Team on AccessibilityARCIICII
Monitor and Maintain AccessibilityARCCCIII
Review Legal/Compliance StandardsACIIIIRI
Report Accessibility StatusARIIIIII

This matrix clarifies the responsibilities and expectations for each team member, ensuring that accessibility efforts are well-coordinated and effectively executed. Ultimately, the RACI matrix you put in place will depend on the specific roles in your organization. By using the RACI framework, teams can improve collaboration and accountability, ultimately creating more inclusive digital experiences.

Related Blog Posts

ADA Title II and PDFs: Fix, Archive, or Delete?

Imagine you work for a state government agency. Over the years, your department has diligently published reports, meeting minutes, forms, budget documents, and countless other materials as PDFs. A quick inventory shows thousands of them – some from last week, others dating back more than a decade. At the time they were created, nobody thought […]

Karl Groves - 30/09/2025

A Quick Primer on Accessible Pagination

Pagination is a common feature across many websites, from news archives and product listings to blogs and search results. Despite its simplicity on the surface, pagination is one of those UI patterns that can be surprisingly nuanced when it comes to accessibility. Most developers implement it using visual styling alone, assuming it “just works.” Unfortunately, […]

Karl Groves - 17/09/2025

Why Now Is Not the Time to Think About WCAG 3

If you work in accessibility or are responsible for compliance at your organization, you’ve probably heard about WCAG 3.0. The W3C has been developing it for years, and the most recent Working Draft was released in September 2025. At first glance, it feels like a big leap forward: a standard that promises to address gaps […]

Karl Groves - 17/09/2025

Accessible by Design: Improving Command Line Interfaces for All Users

The command line interface (CLI) remains a foundational tool in software development, system administration, and DevOps workflows. While graphical user interfaces have become more ubiquitous, the CLI endures due to its flexibility, speed, and power. Yet, for many users with disabilities, particularly those who are blind or visually impaired, command line tools can present unnecessary […]

Karl Groves - 16/09/2025

Reviewing the Logic and Value of the W3C’s Accessibility Maturity Model

Recently, the Web Accessibility Initiative posted on LinkedIn asking for feedback on their Accessibility Maturity Model. While we will be submitting answers to the specific questions in their post, we’d like to also comment on a bigger question: Why does this Accessibility Maturity Model even exist, in the first place? There are strong sentiments that […]

Karl Groves - 11/09/2025