Skip to Content

Blog > Developing a RACI matrix for accessibility

Developing a RACI matrix for accessibility

Karl Groves. - 30/07/2024

In the world of digital projects, ensuring clear roles and responsibilities is crucial for success. One effective tool for achieving this is the RACI matrix, which stands for Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed. This framework helps teams define who is involved in specific tasks and what their level of involvement is. Let’s explore how a RACI matrix can be applied to digital accessibility projects.

What is a RACI Matrix?

A RACI matrix is a simple chart that maps out tasks and activities against roles within a project. Each role is assigned one of the four RACI attributes:

  • Responsible (R): The person who performs the work to complete the task.
  • Accountable (A): The person who is ultimately answerable for the task and has the authority to make decisions.
  • Consulted (C): Those who provide input and feedback, with whom there is two-way communication.
  • Informed (I): Those who need to be kept updated on progress and outcomes, with whom there is one-way communication.

Applying RACI to Digital Accessibility

Digital accessibility ensures that websites and digital tools are usable by people with disabilities. Given the multi-disciplinary nature of accessibility work, a RACI matrix can help coordinate efforts among team members. Here’s an example RACI matrix for a digital accessibility project:

Activity/Task Project Manager Accessibility Lead UX/UI Designer Developer QA Tester Content Creator Legal/ Compliance Stakeholders
Develop Accessibility StrategyARCCICCI
Conduct Accessibility AuditARCCCCCI
Define Accessibility RequirementsARCCICCI
Design Accessible UX/UIACRCIIII
Develop Accessible CodeACIRCIII
Create Accessible ContentACIIIRII
Test for Accessibility ComplianceACCCRIII
Fix Accessibility IssuesACIRCIII
Document Accessibility PracticesARIIICII
Train Team on AccessibilityARCIICII
Monitor and Maintain AccessibilityARCCCIII
Review Legal/Compliance StandardsACIIIIRI
Report Accessibility StatusARIIIIII

This matrix clarifies the responsibilities and expectations for each team member, ensuring that accessibility efforts are well-coordinated and effectively executed. Ultimately, the RACI matrix you put in place will depend on the specific roles in your organization. By using the RACI framework, teams can improve collaboration and accountability, ultimately creating more inclusive digital experiences.

Related Blog Posts

SEO is not accessibility, and we have the data to prove it

Among the many ancillary arguments you tend to hear about why you should care about accessibility is the pitch: “Accessibility improves your SEO!” It’s the sweetener accessibility advocates add add when they suspect compliance alone won’t close the deal. And like most such arguments, it contains just enough truth to survive scrutiny – as long […]

Karl Groves - 11/06/2026

Cool new stuff coming in ARIA 1.3

WAI-ARIA 1.3 is shaping up to be useful for rich document editors, annotation systems, complex forms, and interfaces where visible content does not always map cleanly to what assistive technologies need. Please note: ARIA 1.3 is still a draft. The current W3C ARIA Working Group charter lists WAI-ARIA as a Living Recommendation, with ARIA 1.3 […]

Karl Groves - 20/05/2026

Measuring What Matters

How to Turn Accessibility Work Into Evidence-Based Progress Digital accessibility programs often begin with good intentions: an audit, a backlog of issues, a remediation plan, maybe a few training sessions. But sooner or later, leadership asks a harder question: Are we actually getting better? For many organizations, that question is difficult to answer. Accessibility work […]

Karl Groves - 29/04/2026

The major technical reasons why accessibility overlays don’t work

The Overlay Factsheet describes an accessibility overlay as follows: The fundamental constraint you will notice as you dive into the details below is that post-rendered remediation is working against the framework, not with it. React (and similar frameworks) own the DOM. The framework expects to be the single source of truth for element structure, attributes, […]

Karl Groves - 10/04/2026

VPAT Quality: How to Spot a VPAT That Wasn’t Properly Tested

A VPAT that claims “Supports” across the board is a red flag, not a success. I’ve reviewed hundreds of VPATs—Voluntary Product Accessibility Templates—over the years, and the pattern is unmistakable: many are filed without substantive testing. Organizations create them to satisfy procurement…

Karl Groves - 07/04/2026